Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: right2parent
No, the burden of proof is on those who seek to diminish the right.

Understand that but the presumption of fitness does not always extend to the father.

22 posted on 03/19/2002 6:46:57 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: RGSpincich
Understand that, but the presumption of fitness does not always extend to the father.

The standard does, the practice does not. That's what the appeal process is for. It's an issue of law, not an issue of an abuse of discression. The standards of review are not the same.

25 posted on 03/19/2002 10:18:30 AM PST by right2parent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson