Posted on 03/18/2002 4:30:15 AM PST by MVV
However, I do believe he will hang himself with all of the interviews he's giving. The local station here in Houston is really devoting a lot of air time to whether or not Father Yates can be tried for child endangerment. I'm tending to believe that his involvement goes beyond endangerment. I believe he had too much control over her for her to have done this totally on her own. And I believe that he stood by her through the trial as a means of controlling her in her jail cell. (Of course, I also believe that Oswald did not act alone either and that Mark Furhman planted the glove. LOL)
He probably also told her that the kids were all going to hell because she was doing such a lousy job of raising them. She told the police something like: She had to kill them because she had to save them from going to hell because they had behavior and learning problems. I can see her getting that idea from Rusty berating her.
Comfort her for what??? For killing his kids? I think he's showed there's something weird about himself for supporting this murderer of little children. I would think he's insane if actually stays with her after all this ---too bad he didn't get his family away from her while there was time.
That reminds me of a case here with a 25 year old mother with 4 kids by 4 different boyfriends. Her boyfriend at the time was 'babysitting', before she went out for the night her 4 year old begged her not to leave because Beto hurts them when she's not there. Sure enough he killed the 18 year old ---in front of the 4 year old. When she went to court, all she could claim was what a good mother she is and how much she loves her kids. There's a big disconnect with some people and their kids.
I read an article last nite where Andreas brother said, just prior to the crime, his sister could not even shower herself, that the mother-in-law put her in the shower & also that she was feeding the baby bread crumbs in mashed potatos, that the mother-in-law found strange that was all she'd feed her. They ought to try to get their stories straight. They seem to tailor the answer to the circumstances. First they want her to be nuts for the trial, then they say they never noticed a thing, so they don't take any blame! Sheesh, they're all NUTS!
Most disgusting to me, is that with all that is going on in the world, including the war, and the problems in the middle east, this is the lead headline and story on Today! Sheesh!
He had nothing to do with it.
From this thread women can not take care of themselves.Men have the total responsibilty of making thier women safe from harm. He should of kept the house clean and cared for the children thrown his wife in a wacko ward. By the way I would like to know how many women in the USA would like thier men take control of the family if HE feels she is not doing HER job. What happen to women power!!! Is this not a switch from the 60's . Are men suppose to tell the women how they expect the home and children to be taken care of. Are the families suppose to watch the eachother and take lawful action if THEY dont approve of the conduct of the parents! ARGHHHHHHHH When has this all changed?
Could you write your senator and House Rep to make it law that if a husband deems that his wife is not performing HER duty as a wife that she should be sent to Wife school and get straighten out or can he do that at home himself! IF the husband is not helping out enough then he can be sent to Husband school and be taught the RIGHT way.. GIVE ME A BREAK@!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.