The Supreme Court's decision was an unconstitutional one that a conscientious jurist need not apply strictly, as exemplified by the "no" votes in the Texas case. The conflicts that result between lower courts concerning various abortion restrictions passed by legislatures also serve to prove that judges regularly apply Roe V Wade and Casey in very different ways. Scalia has mentioned this phenomenon is his abortion dissents. So, Gonzales is obviously pro-abortion. The only question is, are conservatives going to roll over once more while a Souter clone in a sombrero is put on the Supreme Court -- right when we are within a vote or two from finishing Roe.