[Sabertooth]

Second your hysterical rants painting all Hispanics with the same brush get tiresome, especially when Sanchez outspent Morales 18 to 1 and won only 2 to 1 in a very low turnout demo primary.

I read many of FITZ's posts, and he is frequently careful to distinguish between Latino citizens, legal immigrants, and illegals.

Check out his post at #75 on this thread:

I also live near the border and have Hispanic friends and Hispanic doctors etc. The problem is --- someone like Sanchez didn't have a chance before the recent massive immigration of people from Mexico ---who are not the same type of people at all as the long-time Hispanic citizens of the US. Most of the Conservatives of Mexico abandoned Mexico at the time of the Revolution. Those are very good conservative people. Mexico is mostly a Socialist country and these new arrivals like Socialism quite a bit. Hispanics voted in higher percentages for Reagan than for Bush because the conservative votes are being diluted out.

Dane, the broad brush and hysteria are yours... again.

[Dane]

Dane, the broad brush and hysteria are yours... again.

No Sabey, the hysteria comes from you and Fitz. No one has argued against the fact that Sanchez won a primary with a very low turnout spending $18 million of his own money. He should have gotten 90% of the vote. He didn't.

JMO, but you all have a knee jerk reaction(which the demo's and the press exploit) when faced with a candidate with a Spanish surname.