In fact I simply had to stop listening to him. SO...just SHUT UP, Rush!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In fact I simply had to stop listening to him. SO...just SHUT UP, Rush!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bush is defenantly no conservative. And I don't care for John Stalincroft either.
C.H.
And most conservatives are getting tired of Bush selling them out.
I am personally disturbed by a lot of the all-or-nothing attitudes and the ensuing flaming going on on this forum lately. Why does everybody have to be labeled either a Bushbot or a Bush basher? Why can't we just support our president, but challenge him when we believe he is wrong? It is a far more loving thing to correct errors, or at least try to, than to ignore them and and instead allow them to drive a wedge between people. Why should this be any less true for the president than for anybody else we care about?
He has a listenership and a following.
I myself am not among them.
I suggest you turn the dial and find yourself a nice Bush-Right-Or-Wrong talkshow host if you're going to get yourself in a snit with one of Rush's rare disagreements with our President.
Not to worry, there are PLENTY of them out there.
"who pays the UN costs to overthrow the American way of life with your tax dollars."
The very FIRST order of business for Congress last year, while Republicans still had the majority in the Senate,
was to authorize back payments to the UN.
8 years of klintoon to clean up and this was their 1st priority.
27 posted on 3/16/02 1:40 PM Pacific by 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/647551/posts?
If Bush were to actually behave like a conservative, then Rush could play cheerleader instead of critic. Here's just a little quote to think about:
Karl Rove tells me that you're thinking about running. What are you going to run on, Tom? Patients' Bill of Rights? I'm for it. Enron? I'm against it. Campaign reform? I'll sign it. Child care? Tom, I'm gonna expand child care to those who don't even have children." --George W. Bush at the Gridiron Dinner, Mar. 2002
Does Bush believe in the superiority of traditional conservatism? If so, doesn't he realize that capitulating and me-too-ing the Democratic positions will lead undecided voters to believe that the Republicans are conceding the moral superiority of Democratic positions?
Doesn't he understand that compromising on principles will alienate the core constituency of the Republican Party and suppress the voter turnout on election night?