Skip to comments.
Historic Midway shuts down
washtimes ^
| March 16, 2002
| By Audrey Hudson
Posted on 03/16/2002 4:40:11 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:52:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
I was wondering, if I were to write to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service do you suppose they could tell me where I could get a break?
22
posted on
03/16/2002 6:59:23 PM PST
by
Valin
To: StriperSniper
'Last year, the Fish and Wildlife Service refused to allow veterans to install a flagpole to fly a newly designed flag honoring the atoll as a national memorial, he said.
The agency also denied the veterans a marble monument because the structures would endanger birds by posing a "strike hazard."'
***************************************************************************
These nutcases at the Fish and Wildlife Service can do me a personal favor by doing something to themselves usually considered physically impossible.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The EPA and Goony Bird have done what Yamamoto and 4 heavy carriers could not.
A sad thought as the 60th anniversary roles around.
24
posted on
03/17/2002 12:13:27 AM PST
by
rmlew
To: rmlew
Perhaps someone might have the names of the administrators that are at the bottom of this tyranny. The internet can be a good tool to heat up the drawers of the losers that hide behind their government titles to impose their personal agendas.
To: StriperSniper
Isn't the Fish and Wildlife Service the same bunch that were planting lynx hairs and lying about the spotted owl?
Carolyn
26
posted on
03/17/2002 4:24:41 AM PST
by
CDHart
To: CDHart
Yes, it was them.
Diane Alden did a multi-part article on the lynx, then on the broader issue, she has another series. She does good work in this field and property rights (which are all tangled up in this mess).
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
I do not know the exact reasons for the failed negotiations, but it is clear to me that Veterans groups and their families should be livid mad at the Bush Administration. There is absolutely no reason to prohibit veterans and their families and the public from visiting a site where Democracy was defended with the lives of Americans.
If the "environment" was supposedly so "fragile" there, how come it was blown to bits and recovered just fine since the war? The "environment" argument is absolute baloney.
I suppose the people who lived there are going to be booted out?
This is the kind of thing revolutions are begun for- ceasing citizen property by virtue of insiduously removing the ability to live on it for the sake of "the environment".
President Bush be damed if this is allowed to stand.
This is a ripe time for all veterans to bring their greivances to the President and make him take a stand on the issue.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
YOU DON"T SEARCH ON EXACT TITLES! GET A
CLUE!
To: StriperSniper
Thanks for the info and the link.
Carolyn
30
posted on
03/18/2002 2:16:59 AM PST
by
CDHart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson