Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lott to Block Daschle Aide's Nomination After Democrats Stop Bush Judge Nominee
AP Breaking | Mar 15, 2002 | By Jesse J. Holland

Posted on 03/15/2002 8:07:13 AM PST by Lance Romance

Lott to Block Daschle Aide's Nomination After Democrats Stop Bush Judge Nominee

Published: Mar 15, 2002

advertisement

WASHINGTON (AP) - Senate Republican leader Trent Lott on Friday threatened to retaliate against Democrats for defeating the promotion of one of President Bush's nominees to a federal appeals court.

"I'm not going to let go of it for a long time," said Lott, upset because the Senate Judiciary Committee killed the nomination of U.S. District Judge Charles Pickering of Mississippi to the U.S. Appeals Court in New Orleans.

Lott also announced he will block an aide of Senate Majority Leader Thomas Daschle from getting on the Federal Communication Commission.

Daschle, in response, said that could backfire on Bush's other nominees in the Democratic-controlled Senate. "I would think they would want our cooperation in moving other nominees," the South Dakota Democrat said.

Lott, Pickering's friend of 40 years, called the committee's racially charged proceedings and its 10-9 party-line vote a "slap at Mississippi." The NAACP and other liberal rights groups, a core constituency of the Democrats, strongly disapproved the nomination because they said Pickering supported segregation as a young man and had an ultraconservative voting record as a Mississippi lawmaker.

"This is people trying to use the ghost of the past to try to prevent us from rising up and going forward in a positive way," Lott said. He cited what he called Pickering's close ties to black leaders in Mississippi, some of whom supported his nomination.

Lott took Pickering's defeat personally, but said Democrats also are mistreating Bush's judicial nominees and if it continues "the Senate is going to be in very bad shape."

Lott insisted his plan to block Bush's FCC nomination of Jonathon S. Adelstein, a legislative assistant for Daschle since 1995, has nothing to do with the Pickering vote.

"He's relatively young," said Lott, who insisted he made the decision two weeks ago. "He doesn't have the experience."

Two weeks ago was around the time Lott asked for a delay in the Pickering vote in hopes of finding a Democrat to vote for him.

Daschle called it unfortunate that Lott "would lash out at someone totally uninvolved with the Pickering nomination."

"I don't know if they've given careful thought to that threat, because I think it could easily backfire in many ways that would adversely affect their own agenda," the majority leader said.

Bush wanted the committee to let the full Senate vote on the nomination. Pickering probably would have won a majority there, because at least three Democrats in the Senate, which the party controls 50-49, had said they would vote for him. Daschle has said repeatedly he would block any attempt to vote on Pickering without committee approval.

Pickering "deserves better than to be blocked by a party-line vote of 10 senators on one committee," Bush said. "The voice of the entire Senate deserves to be heard."

One Democrat, Sen. Zell Miller of Georgia, attacked his colleagues. "This action may very well elect a Republican governor in Mississippi," he said.

Senate Judiciary Democrats, however, were united against Pickering. They repeatedly accused Republicans of mistreating many of the nominations made by former President Clinton, to the point of denying hearings for months at a time.

In addition, the committee chairman, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said Pickering "repeatedly injects his own opinions into his decisions on issues ranging from employment discrimination to voting rights."

Other Democrats referred to a case in which Pickering had sought a lighter sentence for a defendant on a cross-burning case, which Republicans contend was misinterpreted by the judge's critics.

Pickering simply does not have "the temperament, the moderation or the commitment to core constitutional ... protections that is required for a life tenure position" on the appeals court, said Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts.

Republicans were equally united in their support of the judge. Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, argued that Bush's nominee had been victimized by a smear campaign by groups seeking to impose "an ideological litmus test" on abortion, civil rights and other issues.

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, also praised Pickering for "moral courage on the issue of race," demonstrated in 1967 when he testified against a Ku Klux Klan leader in Mississippi.

Pickering was not present, but his son, Rep. Charles Pickering, R-Miss., had a seat in the front row of the spectators section. "What is happening to your father today is a great injustice," said Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., addressing his remarks to the young congressman.

"For those who opposed my father, who distorted his record or tried to use the process to extort political gain, I am deeply disappointed and saddened at their lack of character and their use of race to try to reopen old wounds," the younger Pickering said.

The committee's actions left the nomination all but dead. Lott could seek a vote by the full Senate, but Daschle insisted Thursday that he has enough votes to keep that from happening.

---


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: daschlescumbag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: Teacup
Oh good, the gloves are off.

And hidden under the gloves......

FGS

21 posted on 03/15/2002 8:21:46 AM PST by ForGod'sSake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
As much as I would like to think Lott means it. I'm afraid he doesn't have what it takes to take on "mini me D'Hole." D'Hole is like my 13 year old shih tuz. He's blind, and can't hear, but man can he growl! No I don't think they get it.
22 posted on 03/15/2002 8:22:53 AM PST by Teacup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Why did Bush nominate this guy? Was this more of the "let's just try to get along" approach? Now he should see what that got him. He should withdraw the nomination immediately.
23 posted on 03/15/2002 8:23:35 AM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I know. They need to learn Sean Connery's lesson to Kevin costner in The Untouchables:

"You want to get Capone? Here's how you get Capone: He pulls a knife, you pull a gun. They send one of yours to the hospital, you send two of his to the morgue."

This is a start. I just hope we can peel off enough moderates now to kill Shays-Meehan.

24 posted on 03/15/2002 8:24:47 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreePaul
way to go Lotty. Hold back all of the Dem stuff until Pickering is put in with a Recess appt.

Lets Freep Lott and congrat him on this maneuver.

25 posted on 03/15/2002 8:25:10 AM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Lott insisted his plan to block Bush's FCC nomination of Jonathon S. Adelstein, a legislative assistant for Daschle since 1995, has nothing to do with the Pickering vote.

"He's relatively young," said Lott, who insisted he made the decision two weeks ago. "He doesn't have the experience."

This is media fraud. Yes, they tell the story, but they want the reader to walk away with something other than the truth. The above quote is placed AFTER the association of "tit for tat" is well placed in your mind. They know people often don't read the whole story.

26 posted on 03/15/2002 8:25:19 AM PST by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Does Trent "Gutless Wonder" Lott finally have the cojones to move against Tommy Daschund or will he live up to his billing as Tommy's water boy? Stay tuned.
27 posted on 03/15/2002 8:25:59 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Here's a shout-out to the Honorable Mr. Jim Jeffords!
28 posted on 03/15/2002 8:26:29 AM PST by to the core
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
LOL, maybe mess up their nail polish?
29 posted on 03/15/2002 8:27:17 AM PST by Teacup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Senate Republican leader Trent Lott on Friday threatened to retaliate against Democrats

Daschle's scared, can you tell? The great Cave-a-Lott has spoken.

30 posted on 03/15/2002 8:27:42 AM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
Now there's a picture! HA! HA! HA!
31 posted on 03/15/2002 8:28:45 AM PST by Teacup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Lance..,..

Remember when Vacant Lott was in charge, he wanted to be NICE and share power with Daschle????? Well now WE are paying the price for the stupidity of this gutless wonder.

32 posted on 03/15/2002 8:29:35 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
you mean a purse not a rule book? lol
33 posted on 03/15/2002 8:30:07 AM PST by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
"Daschle, in response, said that could backfire on Bush's other nominees in the Democratic-controlled Senate. "I would think they would want our cooperation in moving other nominees," the South Dakota Democrat said." Oh, my goodness, how could we ever get along without their "cooperation"? I suggest that Lott not only block any and all future Democrat nominations, but that he put chewing gum on their chairs, vaseline on their office doorknobs, and superglue in their hair tonic.
34 posted on 03/15/2002 8:30:21 AM PST by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
You forgot formatting...

"Daschle, in response, said that could backfire on Bush's other nominees in the Democratic-controlled Senate. "I would think they would want our cooperation in moving other nominees," the South Dakota Democrat said."

Oh, my goodness, how could we ever get along without their "cooperation"? I suggest that Lott not only block any and all future Democrat nominations, but that he put chewing gum on their chairs, vaseline on their office doorknobs, and superglue in their hair tonic.

35 posted on 03/15/2002 8:31:42 AM PST by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Dear Tommy,

Bite me.

Sincerely,
Trent.

36 posted on 03/15/2002 8:32:13 AM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Lott also announced he will block an aide of Senate Majority Leader Thomas Daschle from getting on the Federal Communication Commission. Daschle, in response, said that could backfire on Bush's other nominees in the Democratic-controlled Senate. "I would think they would want our cooperation in moving other nominees," the South Dakota Democrat said.

I can't believe that a man with such a small stature has such balls. When will the Republicans grow some?

37 posted on 03/15/2002 8:33:36 AM PST by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linn37
LOL........you said it, not me!
38 posted on 03/15/2002 8:34:02 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Dear Tommy,

Sorry about that 'bite me' thing. Please like me.

Love,
Trent

39 posted on 03/15/2002 8:34:19 AM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Daschle is just another of the Clintonazis, an accomplice for the former felon-in-chief.

Congress in session protects these Senator/House member fasciscts, but during recess, the guilty should be arrested for leaking secret files.

Lott is too pathetic to be effective.

40 posted on 03/15/2002 8:35:49 AM PST by SevenDaysInMay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson