Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosierham
Mrs. Carnahan would NEVER have been allowed to be seated as a Senator if she was a Republican ! The Republicans should have offered their condolences but should not have GIVEN AWAY a Senate seat.

I was always under the impression that the Senate cannot refuse to seat someone simply because they don't like them; they have to have some sort of legitimate argument as to why the person is unfit to serve. Thus, when Ashcroft decided not to contest the election and Carna-HAM's appointment, the Senate had no legitimate legal reason to consider refusing to seat her.

Anyone know if I'm right on this?

153 posted on 03/14/2002 4:48:01 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: Timesink
I have a better idea: They should have demanded to seat Mel himself. Have a coffin sitting in the Senate chamber.
162 posted on 03/14/2002 5:01:02 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Do you think for one minute a Democrat attorney general would not have contested awarding the election to a dead candidate's spouse ?

And rightfully so; the Republican Ashcroft was derelict to allow the widow a Senate seat as though the wife ran for election instead of the husband.

225 posted on 03/15/2002 3:07:20 AM PST by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson