Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat
Am I the only person who finds that headline grammatically odd?

No. The word "knowingly" brings human motives into what would have otherwise been a simple statement of fact.

Adding the word "knowingly" means either that someone knew the data was faulty yet allowed it to be published anyway, or falsified the data for some reason, and now has been discovered. It could also mean that a third party did the discovering. It's impossible to tell whether it was an honest mistake or a conspiracy of some kind from the headline.

A proper headline would have read:

"Owl Data Knowingly Falsified"

or

"Errors discovered in Owl Data"

Don't feel bad, such headlines are typical of the dumbed-down "journalists" who "write" for newspapers these days. Their college degrees are equivalent to what people of my generation (I'm 55) learned in grade school, as I point out every day to the 20-nothing graduates I work with, who don't know the speed of light, how many sqare inches are in a square foot, whether the Korean War was before or after WWII, or which is bigger, 1/3 or 1/4.

Don't get me started...

65 posted on 03/14/2002 2:01:33 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: snopercod
The judge found the employees "knowingly" went forward, because two studies, one independent and one by another federal agency, found the information faulty and acted anyway. It's in the article.
77 posted on 03/14/2002 4:35:34 PM PST by Beamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson