It is unfortunate that the creationists insert the existence or nonexistence of God into the debate. However, the article remains full of circular reasoning, logical fallacies and other rhetorical failings. It isn't a discussion of science.
Mi<" the article remains full of circular reasoning, logical fallacies and other rhetorical failings."
Can tell us what logical fallacies you speak of or is it that you disagree with the article but can not give any refutation of it?