[Mrs.Liberty]

And you are right, Kim.....BUT, when it goes to trial, and Feldman asks the detective again about how he did not know about those bits of info, it will not look good to a jury. And it only takes one juror. Why didn't he know? If I am the lead I am going to want to know about all the evidence. Did someone just not tell me by accident, OR.....?

[Freedom2specul8]

Good points!! IMHO, It's always good to know the answers before the questions are given--that's important for both defense and prosecution. I highly suspect that feldman KNEW the lead investigator was in the dark in those details. For all we know, that may be a common thing...but the prosecution can offset this ''current problem'' by interviewing the people who actually gathered the evidence..and explaing either thru their closing arguments or detectives how they pieced together the evidence and pointed the finger at westerfield.