See this is what I am trying to avoid. I am not the one throwing God into this at all, I wanted to see if this existence from NOTHING to SOMETHING could be explained without interjecting the "big magic-yet-anthropic entity" (That's Hillarious!)
See, some kind of entity HAS TO BE thrown in at some point because we have no concept of nonexistance or ever existance (No begining, no end) in a pure sence, and I believe we look at everything from the dimension of time/space which is not the end-all dimension. You can not explain or atleast reference this problem and logically conclude that Something comes from Nothing without interjecting "Something Exsisted". And when you have to conclude that, then you have to conclude an entity.
My own mind (like that of many another) has trouble with the idea of the universe always having existed. It also has trouble with the idea that the universe has not always existed.
Because you will not open your mind and bring yourself to conclude that there might be a "big magic-yet-anthropic entity" ;-)
HE's just another layer on the problem, a layer that isn't helping a bit.