Tancredo doubts he can block amnesty-extension bill

Denver Post ^ | March 8, 2002 | Bill McAllister

[Twodees]

You claimed I lost, you prove it. BTW, I was simply going along with your idiocy. The bet wasn't offered to you, remember? Yep, you're as dimwitted as I thought. Go see if you can find some of your fellow liberals to talk to.

[christine]

bam, i just now saw your post. thank you for trying to lift my spirits. :)

[slimer]

and a big NO! for slimer.

[PRND21]

You claimed I lost, you prove it... Go see if you can find some of your fellow liberals to talk to.

That's what I'm doing, Dem Donor.
If you don't have the $20 you don't need to make excuses. Did an illegal take your job?

[PRND21]

If your Rep. voted YES on Amnesty...that 1 vote is 100% responsible!

Nice logic.

[PRND21]

So target these seats and make sure that the Republican does not win.

You are the most honest of all the Propogangsters. Thanks, Newbie.

[WRhine]

Perhaps you are not aware that Reagan admitted later in his presidency that he should have never agreed to the Amnesty in 1986. Reagan was not a sovereignty trading fool like what he have in the White House today.

[Joaquin]

In the course of both his John Gibson and Bill O'Reilly interviews Tom Tancredo made it clear that ONE MORE VOTE would have defeated amnesty!

I suggest we all take a look to see who our "new" congress critters are.
The rep in my current district (Pombo) voted no on this.
My "new" rep (Ose) voted yes!

This link takes California Freeepers to the new district info.

[4Freedom]

Gekas and all of the other Republicans were complicit in the passing of this bill, even if they voted against it. They allowed this measure to pass with little or no media attention. The Republicans all helped keep this issue off the public's radar screen.

They're all culpable and should incur our wrath come election time. Put them all out on the street. Let them get real jobs, so they can see, first hand, what we're talking about.

[jla]

Perhaps you are not aware that Reagan admitted later in his presidency that he should have never agreed to the Amnesty in 1986.

Then make me aware and show me his actual quote.

Reagan was not a sovereignty trading fool like what he have in the White House today.

I didn't realize that the bill President Reagan signed, or the one just passed by the House, gave outright ownership of the United States to these immigrants.

Now let me tell you what Reagan did believe: he believed that America, unlike places as the USSR or Red China didn't have to build walls, real or symbolic, to keep people in, or keep out those seeking economic liberty and freedom.
Reagan had confidence in the ideals of Americanism, and conservatism.

And FYI, those who will benefit from the most recent bill have already been here. The only 'law' being broken is the ineptness of a gov.'t bureaucracy, the INS.

[Twodees]

Tell you what: you ping JR and ask him to state whether or not it was you who complained about that post and I'll up the bet to $100 and make it between you and me. You realize that you're betting as well, don't you?

BTW, I haven't been in a position to worry about an illegal taking my job since I was in my 20's. An illegal would have had to shut my business down somehow to "take my job".

[Twodees]

Karl, I have a different view. My view is that the GOP isn't conservative and never has been. A Republican In Name Only would be someone who doesn't toe the party line but who maintains party membership, correct? That would make the few actual conservatives among GOP officeholders the real RINOs.

We should have formed a new conservative party in the 60s instead of switching to the GOP. You aren't going to "reform" the GOP. It would be like trying to polish a turd.

[TEXICAN II]

This should refute any & all who 'advocate' for the Poor, deserving criminal aliens. Need update weekly, perhaps an immigration/invasion clock!!!

Correlate to the number of employers who should serve time/pay confiscatory fines ( to pay the cost of apprehension ).

[TEXICAN II]

Marine Inspector at #1622 has a chart on apprehensions in the open border areas-we could well use an 'immigration/invasion' CLOCK. Daily, weekly, monthly. Thsi fine fellow has the numbers & so, probably, do several org's.