Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Frohickey
M-U-Z-Z-L-E C-O-N-T-R-O-L.

The kid may have been on the other side of the house, so without knowing the facts it is hard to state that negligence is a factor.

I have a bunch of 700's and have modified them all to remove the bolt lock. The only thing between you and an accidental discharge is 0.030" of sear engagement, and less if sear return is hampered by some crud or congealed grease in cold weather. The Remington safety, being a trigger-blocking safety, is inherently not as safe as a firing pin locking type like a Winchester M70. Unfortunately, M70's are not as accurate a design as the Remington (no flames, please...you never see Winchesters winning benchrest matches, but Remingtons are common). Winchesters feature a middle safety position to allow unloading without disengaging the firing pin lock. Much safer.

71 posted on 03/08/2002 2:16:32 PM PST by Zulu Warrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Zulu Warrior
The kid may have been on the other side of the house, so without knowing the facts it is hard to state that negligence is a factor.

Yep. The kid was on the other side of the trailer, and the mom was unloading the rifle inside. If she controlled the muzzle, and say, pointed it at the ground or floor of the trailer, if it went off, no one would be hurt or killed. If she had unloaded it in the field, aimed at a tree, no one would be hurt or killed (well, maybe a environmentalist might die of shock, but I think they grow on trees... at least they fall from trees). ;)

73 posted on 03/08/2002 4:56:46 PM PST by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson