Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leesylvanian;Polybius;sam_paine;McGavin999;mewzilla;Steve0113;GussiedUp;Thane_Banquo;
No, we refuse to call them prisoners of war because, under the Geneva Convention, they do not qualify as such:

I understand the technical arguments, but I was talking about being practical. You're not going to get far with a group by saying: "You have to treat our guys as POWs, but we don't have to treat your guys the same way."

113 posted on 03/06/2002 8:19:59 AM PST by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: Brookhaven
Unfortunately, I don't think the military really expects civil treatment for any of our guys who may be captured. It goes with the territory. That's why I favor Daisy Cutters, 24/7.
115 posted on 03/06/2002 8:29:40 AM PST by Leesylvanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven
I understand the technical arguments, but I was talking about being practical. You're not going to get far with a group by saying: "You have to treat our guys as POWs, but we don't have to treat your guys the same way."

These are the people who slit the throats of airline stewardasses with box cutters and then flew airliners filled with men women and children into skyscrapers filled with thousands of civilians.

You are not going to get anywhere with them no matter what you do short of killing them.

I would not expect a rabid dog not to bite if given the chance. Likewise, I do not expect Al Qaeda to refrain from killing an "American infidel" whenever they have the chance.

118 posted on 03/06/2002 8:46:42 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven; Leesylvanian;Polybius;sam_paine;McGavin999;mewzilla;Steve0113;GussiedUp;Thane_Banquo;
I understand the technical arguments, but I was talking about being practical.

None of you are "being practical" if you are arguing whether or not these guys understand the pros and cons of a Civilized International agreement from the 20th Century if we all know that these ragheads still eat, drink and sleep in the 13th Century.

NO, the Geneva convention does not apply to Al Qaeda!
-AND-
NO, the ragheads DO NOT CARE one way or the other! They will not treat our prisoners any better or any worse since we have no proof that they are even RATIONAL, much less CIVILIZED.

129 posted on 03/06/2002 9:42:57 AM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven
I understand the technical arguments, but I was talking about being practical. You're not going to get far with a group by saying: "You have to treat our guys as POWs, but we don't have to treat your guys the same way."

We are not going to get far (reasoning) with people who are unreasonable and irrational. Please, these people are nothing but low life thugs. You dont try and reason anything out with them, just get rid of them.

175 posted on 03/06/2002 11:52:23 AM PST by RC30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson