Yes I did. You said they were "extreme". I guess you didn't like them. But they are certainly examples that would falsify evolution.
Here's a few more:
Find an indigenous lemur in siberia. Evolution predicts you won't.
Find a platypus in Britain. Ditto.
Why are there no human remains older than 200,000 years in North or South America? Evolution has an answer - find some, and the theory's in trouble.
Do birds have chlorophyll? Why not? Again, evolution predicts that they shouldn't. If you found one, it'd be a coup.
Find mastodon remains in the same strata and location as T. Rex.
I could go on...
Evolution predicts nothing of the sort.
If a species of non-plants were discovered with similar redox centers it would in no way challenge evolution.
Now come up with something serious.
The last five years has brought about the greatest increase of biological data in history.
I am talking about the various genome projects.
These data allow us to now examine and test specific hypotheses concerning evolutionary theory and how evolution is reflected in the genomes.
How about some examples from something like this -- doable questions with yes or no answers.