Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
they'll be trashing the vd's in public via the medai

But wouldn't the/a gag order prevent this?

DW's lawyer argued for a gag order but that was denied for now. Seems to me if he wanted to trash the VD's, then he would not want a gag order. Then, of course, his client is fair game as well if there is no gag order. If both sides agree or argue for a gag order, then perhaps there is truth to the swinging...can't have that get out if you are a lawyer for the VD's.

87 posted on 03/06/2002 1:52:25 PM PST by Mrs.Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs.Liberty
DW's lawyer argued for a gag order but that was denied for now. Seems to me if he wanted to trash the VD's, then he would not want a gag order. Then, of course, his client is fair game as well if there is no gag order. If both sides agree or argue for a gag order, then perhaps there is truth to the swinging...can't have that get out if you are a lawyer for the VD's.

I did skim over that article..but hadn't read it in its entirety. Well, the gag order would be on evidence entered, I think..so it wouldn't hurt the van dams..unless their swinging lifestyle was a contributory factor and entered into evidence..

109 posted on 03/06/2002 3:07:55 PM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson