Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jcyrix
"Windows is nothing more than a graphical interface for dos."

Do you really believe that lie, or you just repeating something you heard some muttonhead blubber out on some leet bord?

Windows has never been "nothing more than a graphical interface for dos". From inception, it was a cooperative multitasker (you know, like the notorious Crapentosh used for lo those many years, up until just recently). The early versions did indeed run on top of DOS, and used DOS interrupts to handle various I/O tasks.

Beginning with Win95, Windows was a preemptive multitasker (like unix). It used DOS as nothing more than a bootstrap loader, unless you needed to use "legacy" drivers (16 bit).

NT has been entirely "DOSless" from day one.

132 posted on 03/05/2002 3:19:18 PM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Don Joe
You can't tell me Windows in not Dos based. Remove command.com and see if Windows will still run. Command.com is strictly Dos and Windows will not run without it.
161 posted on 03/06/2002 2:15:18 PM PST by jcyrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson