Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWC_minion
"...in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons."

To me, the resolution is still referring to those directly responsible. I don't see it as an open-ended free-for-all.

46 posted on 03/05/2002 8:23:56 AM PST by oursacredhonor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: oursacredhonor
Even at the time it was discussed it was clear to all that the war would take us to many places. It was also clear that Bush would not be required to demonstrate a direct connection. The explicit language of the resolution reflects that.

A different reading is an attempt to parse away the orginal meaning and intent.

48 posted on 03/05/2002 8:33:41 AM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson