So you can attempt to paint invalid pictures of reality (A hallmark in liberal thought) but others will see quite a different image. An invalid picture?
You ran for public office as a Libertarian.
There's nothing invalid about that picture.
And it's not like this is ancient history.
It was just a few years ago.
It is much better to attack my statements out of context isn't it? I thought you where here to discuss the issue of Gays in the church. I was under the impression you where going to tell us that its Ok to have Gay leaders in the church. I must have been wrong about that because you are so far off topic. I'm flattered you find me so interesting but the purpose of this thread is quite different from the topic you wish to discuss.
My personal life and its details are unimportant in light of the purpose of this thread. Grow up and stick to the subject at hand. You must have some opinion on the redeeming qualities of having homosexual priests. Other than the opportunity for our young children to engage in perverted sex acts.