Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spald
Unfortunately, unless she was acting in immediate response to some act committed against her son, her actions were those of a vigilante--exactly what CCW is supposed NOT to be about.
3 posted on 03/03/2002 6:21:46 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
I agree that this could be a blow to CCW, but....

What would you do in a similar situation? It would certainly be difficult for me to just sit by and watch a corrupt and disfunctinal legal system slowly work ---- or not.

8 posted on 03/03/2002 6:29:59 PM PST by TheBattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: supercat
your post #3: "Unfortunately, unless she was acting in immediate response to some act committed against her son, her actions were those of a vigilante--exactly what CCW is supposed NOT to be about."

Grand Jury did not come to that conclusion and let her off. There must have been compelling evidence given the GJ that lessened or eliminated what appears to be vigilateism.

10 posted on 03/03/2002 6:33:48 PM PST by spald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: supercat
As a former cop who has successfully arrested and assisted in the successful prosecution of murderers, only to have them get out of prison in less than three years and then kill my friends, I have to admit I SUPPORT VIGILANTISM. Get the bad guys out of our society forever.
16 posted on 03/03/2002 8:30:09 PM PST by stumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson