Replies

Kim, with all due respect, you're not a flamer. You're more of an insinuator. You prefer to work with innuendo and twisting words.

For instance, you asked me if I felt Mrs. VD was like a well-known serial killer, when what I said was that she lacked emotion. The attempt to put words in my mouth in comparing Mrs. VD to a serial killer was transparent, but I give you E for effort.

The fact that some of us do not like what the ever-changing stories indicate about the VDs seems to bother you. Time is going to tell the tale, however, and I trust my own instincts on this one--and those of several other very good Freeper researchers.

Your work on your web page is commendable, but it's work many of us have already done on a day to day basis following this case. And so far, the facts gleaned from your work seem not to have assisted you in seeing the obvious. Bias often brings that about.

That was not an insinuation. I was simply trying to understand your concept of what an emotionless mother was like. It was a statement that imho needed clarification. It was NOT a twist of words. A twist of words would have been more like "well, since you believe she IS a socio or psycho path"...but that's not what I did. I believe I phrased it in the form of a question..on purpose. IMHO, it's wrong to insult people's intelligence..especially someone such as yourself, who does NOT go out of her/his way to belittle or degrade a fellow freeper.

Yes, the news accounts on that webpage are difficult to hold up against Ricky Roberts version of what happened. I agree. I'm not going to argue against speculation, innuendos, gossip and rumors. How does one do that?