This is FR. You can post whatever you want so long as it isn't racist, abusive, etc. You know the rules.
As to correctness, there is certainly a problem with posting material and representing it as the opinions of others when it is not their opinion. They can simply deny its accuracy.
I, however, am not posting your opinions for you. I'm attempting to post accurate definitions of a historic theological acronym known as "tulip." It is certainly significant that you say you believe "tulip" to be the truth of the bible. I will accept any legitimate modifications to the definitions given by those who are part of the calvinist movement. Your web link to a site with "tulip" definitions was certainly helpful.
These are the definitions I will use for reference on all calvinist threads in the future, with a mind, of course, to refining them as legitimate input is given.
Ahah, I was correct in my understanding of your motives. It is sooo much easier to dismiss us once you put us in our proper cubby-holes, isn't it?
Besides, we have already told you that we don't agree with your presentation of "U", "L", "I", and "P", so what good are your cubby-holes anyway? We choose not to tell you where your cubby-holes are deficient until such time as you tell us where our "T" is deficient.
(I don't think we are going to have much "understanding" around here, but if that is the way you want it...)