Respectfully, my point stands, whether or not I should care to annex a "Nanny Nanny Boo Boo" to my statement of the point.
If our definition of Total Depravity is Biblically incorrect, then there is no need to procede to the next point of the Remonstration; our position would be groundless.
On The Other Hand, if our definition of Total Depravity is Biblically correct, we may then examine the next point to determine the rectitude thereof.
Ergo, we request the arminian objection (if any) to the doctrine of Total Depravity, summed in one sentence, or your agreement that the doctrine of Total Depravity, as stated, is Biblically Correct.
After that point is addressed, we shall be delighted to proceed.
So, naturally, I expect that you will kindly either address our definition, or agree thereto, before we proceed. Thanks.
Best,
Op
See you late night.
But you have no grounds to expect anything from me. Because I do not recognize you as an authority. Your post is all too indicative of the tag team pattern with which you people operate. I've followed your posts this week and I've gone back into the archives. You just don't get it. Or maybe you do.
Mom sends up the Bat Signal and Opie comes in with his Al Haig act and says "I'm in charge here and unless we play by my rules, the game is over."
Your childish post reeks of the arrogance you people so vehemently deny. I have had enough.
Do not ping me. Do not freepmail me.
Of all the things I've seen this week, I still stand amazed that the "totally depraved" view themselves so "scripturally inerrant."