I agree. And I don't want to go off on a tangent. I have absolutely no desire to get into that debate. I was just curious.
For the record though, Reformed Presbyterians pretty much don't allow women to do anything without a "covering." Meaning no women elders, deacons, worship leaders, etc. Women can teach children, but cannot teach a class with men unless there is a "covering" (i.e. her husband, a pastor, an elder) present.
I would agree with that. Thus my flags to the guys:>)