Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Khepera
You have seen it as I was saying it with a couple of caveats.

The primary reason I won't identify the perverts by name to OWK is because it's not his business if they haven't already identified themselves to him. I'm not a gossiper.

The secondary reason is that I don't actually keep a list. I know that more than one SAD have identified themselves to me recently and I have debated them openly on that thread. But I didn't write their names down and don't remember who they are right now. If they pop up out of the woodwork again, and they give me permission, I may send a FReepmail to OWK and say, "Here's one" but probably not. What some third party may or may not be is not germaine to any discussion between OWK and me, and I can't imagine why he wants to insert himself into this.

Unless, as I said, it is a not-so-subtle attempt to get me to violate one of the rules of common decency.

Shalom.

119 posted on 02/27/2002 5:11:59 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: ArGee
But I didn't write their names down and don't remember who they are right now.
--Argee

I have no specific recollection
--Bill Clinton.

126 posted on 02/27/2002 7:39:23 AM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: ArGee
What some third party may or may not be is not germaine to any discussion between OWK and me...

And yet you feel no particular restraint in discussing "the perverts" here, without any reference to who you speak of.

Go figure

127 posted on 02/27/2002 7:48:48 AM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson