[Dimensio]

In other words, you're not going to answer the hypothetical question I posed. My point was that homosexual advocates use the argument that their sexual behavior is legitimate, normal, and nodody's business because it is between two consenting adults. So what about incest? If incest between an adult father and daughter became the sexual flavor of the day--would you also say then that it is legitimate? You'll have to in order to remain consistant.

I'll grant that homosexual sex is "nobody's business [when] it is between two consenting adults", but "normal" has too many definitions to be used here without making it ambigious and "legitimate" strikes me as an opinion-based value-judgement -- I really can't think of how any sexual act, whether between a same-sex couple or an opposite sex couple could be consireded to be overall "legitimate" (or "illegitimate" for that mater)-- so I can't agree with that either.

Given what I do agree with -- that homosexual sex is "nobody's business [when] it is between two consenting adults" -- I would also agree that the same applies to incest.

[JMJ333]

Given what I do agree with -- that homosexual sex is "nobody's business [when] it is between two consenting adults" -- I would also agree that the same applies to incest.

Speechless.