Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"It really takes all the sting out of these laws"

I presume, the pun was intended.

1 posted on 02/21/2002 12:36:24 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gay activists had argued the laws violated freedom of expression and other constitutional rights and could be used by prosecutors to intimidate anyone arrested for sex activity.

Wouldn't heterosexuals be arrested if they had sex in public?

2 posted on 02/21/2002 12:39:52 PM PST by DallasDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Full cooperation/collusion of church and state. Slop wher you told to slop, suck what your told to suck. (State Motto)
4 posted on 02/21/2002 1:05:06 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Private and consenual is none of my business.

Mass. is pretty screwy anyhow. As late as the 50s and into the 60s, condoms were illegal as a method of contraception.

5 posted on 02/21/2002 1:33:14 PM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Massachusetts' highest court on Thursday upheld two anti-sodomy laws but limited enforcement to cases when specific sex acts occurred in public or weren't consensual.

Well duh. Who wants a big brother government knocking on doors to see what is going on behind closed doors? If it isn't in public, then who the hell cares?

6 posted on 02/21/2002 1:37:41 PM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Calling Gerry Studds, Barny Frank, Patches Kennedy....
7 posted on 02/21/2002 3:14:32 PM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I see the relativists are out in full force. Oh no! Can't have sodomy laws because the acts are between consenting adults! No word yet on what they think about incest, but to remain consistant they'll have to say the same thing.
17 posted on 02/21/2002 5:13:54 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gay activists had argued the laws violated freedom of expression

Uh? Since when impersonation became legal?

52 posted on 02/22/2002 4:28:30 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
For those with or without K-Y Jellie.....

...."It really takes all the sting out of these laws"

63 posted on 02/22/2002 6:47:40 AM PST by TRY ONE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Gay activists had argued the laws violated freedom of expression and other constitutional rights

Yeah, last time I read the constitution it had a BIG section on allowing anal sex between men in public places. Doesn't it encourage it? (sarcasm off)

I think it's time for conservative groupd to pool sources in these fights. There are just too many. ANd they all come from the same one or two pro-homosexual groups.

82 posted on 02/22/2002 10:59:45 AM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson