"It really takes all the sting out of these laws" I presume, the pun was intended.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gay activists had argued the laws violated freedom of expression and other constitutional rights and could be used by prosecutors to intimidate anyone arrested for sex activity. Wouldn't heterosexuals be arrested if they had sex in public?
2 posted on
02/21/2002 12:39:52 PM PST by
DallasDeb
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Full cooperation/collusion of church and state. Slop wher you told to slop, suck what your told to suck. (State Motto)
4 posted on
02/21/2002 1:05:06 PM PST by
Waco
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Private and consenual is none of my business.
Mass. is pretty screwy anyhow. As late as the 50s and into the 60s, condoms were illegal as a method of contraception.
5 posted on
02/21/2002 1:33:14 PM PST by
RJCogburn
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Massachusetts' highest court on Thursday upheld two anti-sodomy laws but limited enforcement to cases when specific sex acts occurred in public or weren't consensual. Well duh. Who wants a big brother government knocking on doors to see what is going on behind closed doors? If it isn't in public, then who the hell cares?
6 posted on
02/21/2002 1:37:41 PM PST by
Bella_Bru
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Calling Gerry Studds, Barny Frank, Patches Kennedy....
7 posted on
02/21/2002 3:14:32 PM PST by
Leisler
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I see the relativists are out in full force. Oh no! Can't have sodomy laws because the acts are between consenting adults! No word yet on what they think about incest, but to remain consistant they'll have to say the same thing.
17 posted on
02/21/2002 5:13:54 PM PST by
JMJ333
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gay activists had argued the laws violated freedom of expression Uh? Since when impersonation became legal?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
For those with or without K-Y Jellie.....
...."It really takes all the sting out of these laws"
63 posted on
02/22/2002 6:47:40 AM PST by
TRY ONE
Gay activists had argued the laws violated freedom of expression and other constitutional rights Yeah, last time I read the constitution it had a BIG section on allowing anal sex between men in public places. Doesn't it encourage it? (sarcasm off)
I think it's time for conservative groupd to pool sources in these fights. There are just too many. ANd they all come from the same one or two pro-homosexual groups.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson