Me too! He's letting the people know who is with him, and who's with the dems ( or other parties out to discredit him). That is punishment for trying to pass this thing. He will send it back. It's unconstitutional, and there's nothing there he asked for. He will not let the union thing go, either.
In the meanwhile, what can Freepers do? Simple. Apply the law. File a mess of lawsuits against anyone exercising their free speech rights. If some website has an ad for or an endorsement of a Democratic candidate, you take 'em to court (in the words of Doug Lewellyn of the People's Court). Because that's a violation of the bill. Then take it a step further by challenging the law. Sue to stop newspaper editorials, on the grounds that allowing newspaper editorials while not allowing independent groups to advertise is a violation of the equal protection clause. I'm not a lawyer, but I imagine that some lawyers out in the great big world could have some real fun with this! There must be some location in the country without a daily paper but with TV coverage (because the bill explicitly allows newspapers but not television ads).
Next, let's show the evils of the database of contributors. Currently, there are these databanks of all these donors online. Let's band together and make a website that reveals all kinds of information about the donors, in an effort to get these lists removed. Download and database the donor lists. Not difficult. Then cross reference them with domania.com or whatever to get the amount that they paid for their houses and integrate this online. Link in their telephone numbers through Yahoo or some other online phone book. The aim here is to get people so mad about this they demand an end to frivolous disclosure.