Posted on 02/20/2002 10:03:33 AM PST by knak
Tehran - The Russian Duma plans to issue a resolution in support of Iran, Iraq, and North Korea. The Russian news agency Interfax reported that Russian Duma MPs believe that the U.S. can not settle its problems with Iran, Iraq and North Korea through slogans.
The draft of the resolution entitled "World Security Threats and International Actions Against Terrorism" condemns baseless accusations against other countries that obstruct the development of international cooperation.
According to another report, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Georgy Mamedov said in Moscow on Tuesday that most countries, including U.S. allies, have not welcomed the recent U.S. actions.
In a meeting with the Iranian Ambassador to Moscow, Gholamreza Shafei, he said that since U.S. President George W. Bush has been criticized by some of his colleagues for his threatening statements against certain countries, Washington is trying to change its policies toward the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Referring to the negative remarks of some U.S. officials, Mamedov said that such hyperbole is characteristic of U.S. officials with regard to international issues.
On Russia's opposition to the theory of a "unipolar world", he reiterated that Moscow follows an independent foreign policy and will not tolerate being pressured by any country.
On the expansion of Tehran-Moscow relations, particularly in recent years, the Russian official said that since the two countries' bilateral cooperation is based on international norms and regulations, Moscow's friendly cooperation with the Islamic Republic of Iran will continue despite the pressures exerted by some foreign countries.
At the moment, I'd discard the possibility of a full-scale war with Russia. I'd be much more worried if China offered to buy a few ICBM's from Russia (say, 1$bil/ICBM). For example, the ones that Russia intends to discard anyway.
No global thermo nuclear isn't the only threat. Its just the one nobody wants to think or talk about. And its way more possible than you think. We can squish Iraq... Russia is a whole other ball o' wax.
Wallace212
PTF
It is already a common place. Please tell me why to be ex-intellegence of KGB for Putin while he was rank colonel in there isn't appropiate but to be the director(!) of CIA for George Bush senior is? Please name me the comminusts in today Russai's goverment. At least one? I bet you can't. There are none.
Puhleeez Serge, who said that George Bush Sr. being the director of the CIA was appropriate? I didn't, so don't go putting words in my mouth, ok?
In the 1999 elections for the Duma, the KPRF (that's the name for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation) took 113 seats (top placing party) and 24.3 percent of the total vote/representation in the Duma. Their top man, Gennadiy Andreyevich Zyuganov, was second only to Putin in the Presidential election, with Putin taking 52.9% and Zyuganov taking 2nd place with 29.2%.
So there you go, while the Presidential candidate did not win (obviously), he did place second which displays a large segment sympathetic to communistic ideals, as well as the KPRF taking the lead in seats in the Duma. So in stead of there being "none" as you claim, there are at least 113 known to the public at large.
Please stop assuming that I am coming out against Russia, I am not. I just think that the U.S. should tread carefully and not start assuming that the U.S. can just beat up on anybody it wants with impunity. I'm trying to say that there are consequences to actions that the U.S. is not considering when it starts beating its chest in war fervor, that's all.
Thank you, thank you very much. I'll be in the building all day. Please tip the waitresses, they work hard. G'night everybody.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.