Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian Duma to Issue Resolution in Support of Iran & Iraq
menw ^ | 2/20/02

Posted on 02/20/2002 10:03:33 AM PST by knak

Tehran - The Russian Duma plans to issue a resolution in support of Iran, Iraq, and North Korea. The Russian news agency Interfax reported that Russian Duma MPs believe that the U.S. can not settle its problems with Iran, Iraq and North Korea through slogans.

The draft of the resolution entitled "World Security Threats and International Actions Against Terrorism" condemns baseless accusations against other countries that obstruct the development of international cooperation.

According to another report, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Georgy Mamedov said in Moscow on Tuesday that most countries, including U.S. allies, have not welcomed the recent U.S. actions.

In a meeting with the Iranian Ambassador to Moscow, Gholamreza Shafei, he said that since U.S. President George W. Bush has been criticized by some of his colleagues for his threatening statements against certain countries, Washington is trying to change its policies toward the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Referring to the negative remarks of some U.S. officials, Mamedov said that such hyperbole is characteristic of U.S. officials with regard to international issues.

On Russia's opposition to the theory of a "unipolar world", he reiterated that Moscow follows an independent foreign policy and will not tolerate being pressured by any country.

On the expansion of Tehran-Moscow relations, particularly in recent years, the Russian official said that since the two countries' bilateral cooperation is based on international norms and regulations, Moscow's friendly cooperation with the Islamic Republic of Iran will continue despite the pressures exerted by some foreign countries.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Intimidator
Russia may have the ability to annihilate us but they are not stupid enough or crazy enough to try else they would have done it sometime in the past 50 years. Saddam Hussein is crazy enough

You assume too much about the Russian leaders. We were in a Cold War, our military huge and our resolve against them firm. Today we are not in a Cold War, we have no civil defense to speak of (where's your community bomb shelter? Do you even have a home unit?), our armed forces are stretched about as thin as they can possibly be stretched (Mr. Clinton is the person to talk to about that one, btw), hell, we have NATO AWACS patrolling our skies because ours are being used elsewhere.

Further, there is little to no unity in the United States any longer, other than the jingoistic flag waving that came after 9/11. Even now, the old bickering is returning (not that I mind that, btw). There are growing home grown resistance forces to the FedGov that have not been present since the Civil War or the Revolutionary War. Our economy is slumping, and even in a slow recovery could be easily shaken down to a depression with one or two more well place "terrorist" actions.

Add to that the fact we still haven't deported Jesse Jackson... :)

But seriously, if one were a strategist for a military power capable of surviving a war with the U.S., now is not a bad time to consider taking out the U.S.

Not that they are going to, but I think you don't consider the Russians in the light of their historical unpredictableness.

21 posted on 02/20/2002 11:19:48 AM PST by Lumberjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mvonfr
My college physics are a wee bit rusty, but I know you CANNOT totally contain gamma. Period. You can reduce it until it is lost in the backround, but the amount of LEAD or STEEL or CONCRETE required to effectively hide it enormous. We aren't talking inches, we are talking about yards of sheilding, tons of it.

Not impossible, just very impracticle.

22 posted on 02/20/2002 11:22:39 AM PST by WALLACE212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lumberjack
You took the words right out of my mouth.
23 posted on 02/20/2002 11:25:47 AM PST by WALLACE212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lumberjack
The flag can be a powerful blindfold.

Lumberjack, you've got to get out of the woods once in awhile. The Duma is not the government; it is their parliament and it is dominated by communists. Putin is the govenment. He is a religious man, not a communist. He is also smart. Putin is not going to jeopardize his relationship with the USA by doing anything (other than noise) about our probable preemptive strikes against Iraq.

24 posted on 02/20/2002 11:26:09 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: monday
As you said, we can count on Russia to act in her best interest. Please explain how, in any concievable scenario it might possibly be in Russias best interest to attack the United States? You think we are weak militarily? Russia is a basket case compared to us.
They would profit quite well from a divided United States I would think, as would the Chinese. Without the big boy on the block, there's nobody to check their actions against other nations. Yes, I think we are weak militarily as things stand as of this writing. If you think that the Russians are as bad off as you indicate, I fear you've been misled. We'll see when the time comes I suppose.
Oh BTW, acting in ones best interest is normal, we do it, the Russians do it, every country does it to the extent that they have leadership whos best interest coincides with that of the citizenry.

I believe that I should rephrase my assertion. They pursue what they consider their national interest without regard to consequences, and always have. They almost completely and utterly lost WWII because of this narcissistic policy. They almost lost to Japan for goodness sake at the turn of the last century because of their lack of understanding that a world exists outside their own little plans. That's what I meant, sorry for the confusion. On rereading my statement, I can see where it didn't communicate what I meant for it to communicate.

25 posted on 02/20/2002 11:27:08 AM PST by Lumberjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Lumberjack, you've got to get out of the woods once in awhile. The Duma is not the government; it is their parliament and it is dominated by communists. Putin is the govenment. He is a religious man, not a communist. He is also smart. Putin is not going to jeopardize his relationship with the USA by doing anything (other than noise) about our probable preemptive strikes against Iraq.

Last I checked, Putin is ex-KGB and is quite sympathetic to the communists in his government.

Putin's relationship with the U.S. is only to get us to disarm at a faster rate than they are. There is no two ways about this, and when he feels that he can cut out of the relationship, he will without a second thought. He is not the nice guy most people assume he is. Ask any Russian.

26 posted on 02/20/2002 11:29:42 AM PST by Lumberjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: WALLACE212
My college physics are a wee bit rusty

So is mine, unf. What you said is correct; but it is also the question of distance from the sensor. I suspect that 1-2in Lead container would be sufficient to prevent detection from any distance more than a mile (probably much less). This is already good enough for a Hiroshima-type nuke.

27 posted on 02/20/2002 11:31:14 AM PST by mvonfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mvonfr
DOD wont give me the specs on LACROSSE (LOL), I dunno. If it was easy, it probably would have happened by know, maybe. I can only speculate on the Top Secret stuff.
28 posted on 02/20/2002 11:34:23 AM PST by WALLACE212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: WALLACE212
If it was easy, it probably would have happened by know

Why do you think so? During the Cold War something like this happening would have been interpreted as a hostile act by Russia immediately; this is why Russians did not do it. Now you have to choose between Russia (least likely), China, Pakistan, or Russian mafia/AlQueda/unknows (if they actually may have any). Add Iran or Iraq, and you simply will never know who did this, if such an attack happens. Which makes it much more probable.

29 posted on 02/20/2002 11:42:45 AM PST by mvonfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mvonfr
No disagreement here; I was refering to the Post Cold War threat as you stated....

PS Who do you think is the prime mover behind the Russian Mafiya?

30 posted on 02/20/2002 11:52:20 AM PST by WALLACE212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lumberjack
I don't think anyone is going to nuke anyone. And Russia is NOT the enemy. Russia is owed some 7 billion by Iraq and they want to make sure that's protected. There's a lot of disinformation out there and I believe it's deliberate. There is a great deal of confusion about what will and what will not be done, and that's a pretty good thing IMHO.

Russia will NOT bomb the US if we decide to invade Iraq, but they will want to make absolutely sure that they are protected financially. That's a reasonable stance. As to Iran, I seriously doubt that Russia will take Iran's side in this since Iran is financing the very terrorists who are causing so much death and destruction in Chechnya.

The main idea behind all of this is to get everyone to stop selling arms to those who will use them against the civilized world.

BTW, Iraq could have a missile that would reach the USA tomorrow if someone would sell it to them. Remember that.

31 posted on 02/20/2002 11:54:26 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lumberjack
"If you think that the Russians are as bad off as you indicate, I fear you've been misled. We'll see when the time comes I suppose. "

Unpaid troops, record desertions, ships and submarines without crews or maintainence rusting in harbors, satellite control stations burning down, and no money to replace them. Weapons, even atomic bombs being sold on the black market.

The only reason Russia supports Iran and Iraq in the first place is because they buy millons of dollars worth of munitions from Russia every year. If the US wants Russia on our side all we would have to do is tell the Russian arms manufacturers we will buy a Billon dollars a year from you if you quit selling to the Iraqis and Iranians.

I agree with you that we should not trust Russia, but you see Russia as a threat still... I don't. I don't think I can convince you, we will just have to agree to disagree.

32 posted on 02/20/2002 11:55:30 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
I don't think Russia gives two shots of Stolichnaya about 7 billion bucks; pocket change in arena we are in really. And nobody is going to sell them a complete boost vehicle and warhead, way to easy to trace... hell, the radar tech's at NORAD could probably name the country of origin while its still in the air!
33 posted on 02/20/2002 12:00:03 PM PST by WALLACE212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
What you say make the most sense that I've heard in this thread so far
34 posted on 02/20/2002 12:03:42 PM PST by Intimidator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WALLACE212
PS Who do you think is the prime mover behind the Russian Mafiya?

There is really no such thing as Russian Mafiya.

There are many groupings with various agendas (besides making money in illegal or semi-legal ways). Some are controlled by former Soviet-time criminals. Some are control by ex-KGB or ex-police. Some are controlled by minorities (Chechen mafiya). There are likely some agreements on dividing the areas of operations, but no centralized command. Sometimes they fight each other (much less now), sometimes they cooperate.

So it is in a way like the traditional mafia families; except it is much, much bigger in all ways: they do control a big chunk of the economy (most of non-Mafiya companies pay protection money), they serve different political and economic interests (Berezovsky/Chechens), and they are active in many countries (FARC connections).

But nobody is behind it; just the general deterioration of the society together with a still weak government created opportunities.

35 posted on 02/20/2002 12:07:22 PM PST by mvonfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: WALLACE212
"I don't think Russia gives two shots of Stolichnaya about 7 billion bucks; pocket change in arena we are in really. "

Actually its pretty important when your GNP is smaller than the Netherlands.

36 posted on 02/20/2002 12:09:31 PM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: WALLACE212
Uh huh, and how much good do you think it would do for all the dead Americans if NORAD was able to say....those missile parts came from North Korea made with parts sold by rogue weapons peddlers? The idea is to get out ahead of all this before we have another devistated city and more dead Americans, or are you volunteering your city and your family?
37 posted on 02/20/2002 12:09:52 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
99% agree.

Except that Russia wants a bit more payoff than those $7bil. Possibly a guaranteed share for LUKOIL in post-Saddam Iraq plus non-interferance in Chechnya. But this is an issue of negotiating the price, not of nuclear threats.

38 posted on 02/20/2002 12:11:34 PM PST by mvonfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
I want old Saddam as bad as anyone, if it were simple I'd carpet bomb the place. With W88's, till it was a glass ashtray. Then with VX, by way of poetic justice for the Kurds.

But Russia remains the only formidable STRATEGIC threat on the map.

There is way more than meets the eye at play here. I don't have the time to chisel away at 50 years of disinformation and bad strategic policy. I promise a thread on that subject, when job and family permit.

Wallace212

Count The Cost

39 posted on 02/20/2002 12:18:32 PM PST by WALLACE212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: WALLACE212
But Russia remains the only formidable STRATEGIC threat on the map.

Hmm, I thought it was China.

40 posted on 02/20/2002 12:23:01 PM PST by mvonfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson