You said holding someone on no charges is "wrong". The Constitution makes provisions for this very act in cases of rebellion or invasion with it's "suspension of habeas corpus" paragraph.
Show me where I said that I did not know habeas corpus could be suspended. You have mere speculation on this point and because of your twisted mind you believe that your speculation is fact.
If you knew, why'd you ask?
NO, NO, NO. You say to lock up suspicious Islamic-Americans. In WWII all Japanese Americans were locked up and only released when taking oath to fight for this country. Don't sugar coat it moron, tell the facts. So why are we not suspending habeas corpus and locking them all up?
Because this country is more liberal than in 1941, and we will pay soon by further terrorist acts.
I don't want your opinion, I want to know why we are not locking them up?
Liberalism.
If you are not afraid to answer questions, why do you refuse to do so until called on it? Do you need more time to think up your retarded responses?
I've answered every question you've asked, several times as a matter of fact.
What did I tell you about your catch phrase? I better see it next time. I'm not going to tell you again.
Results suggest you are wrong on your points.
Again I didn't ask for your opinion. Why did we pay and say we were sorry if we did nothing wrong? What was the motivation of the gov't at the time?
Window dressing, I suppose. The act wasn't wrong no matter what those who came later and who weren't in the situation that those in 1941 were in say.
Once again you have failed to show proof that I cannot make up my mind.
You say that you would have done the same but that it was wrong.
Surely you have some sort of evidence.
You said that you would have done the same but condemn those that did it.
Nope I forgot you live in fantasy land where your opinion is fact. You keep going and that foot is going to be coming out of you a$$ soon.
You're getting awfully worked up. LOL