I don't care what others have said. So are you saying there was or was not Japanese-American sabotage?
I said:
Its not me or others saying it genius. HISTORY says their was sabotage.
So then you said:
Sabotage by who, Germans or Japs?
Then I said:
You asked about Japanese-American sabotage and now you can't remember whether it was Jap or German?
So would you please keep up with the thread? I feel like a court room reporter that has to repeat everything back to you.
Caught you again and once again no answer.
Where did I say "I have no respect for the Constitution."? I said that everything that the Supreme Court has found to be right has not always stood the test of time. BIG DIFFERENCE!!
So if it was done for public safety and not because racism was acceptable back then, why aren't we taking such precautions right now? Why haven't Muslims and Arabs been locked up? We have had sabotage, and there is still a threat. Why did the Bush administration go to great pains to make it clear that there would be no repeat of what happened to the Japanese Americans in WWII?
AHHH another question goes unanswered. Why (like I asked you last time) did the gov't apoligize and pay money if what was done was right for the country. We should have nothing to be sorry for, shouldn't we?
You been playing this game for a while now trying to make it seem like I can't make up my mind, but like with everything else you have shown no proof.
So you've changed your mind and are now admitting that there was Jap sabotage?
Caught you again and once again no answer. Where did I say "I have no respect for the Constitution."? I said that everything that the Supreme Court has found to be right has not always stood the test of time. BIG DIFFERENCE!!
The Supreme Court has the final say. You didn't even know that habeas corpus can be suspended until I told you.
So if it was done for public safety and not because racism was acceptable back then, why aren't we taking such precautions right now?
We should be. Intern suspicious Islamic-Americans until we find and kill all the terrorists. There'll be another terrorist attack I'll bet, possibly with a nuke, and it will be carried out with the help of Islamic-Americans, just like 9-11 was.
Why haven't Muslims and Arabs been locked up?
Because we're much more liberal than in 1941. And we'll pay for it.
We have had sabotage, and there is still a threat. Why did the Bush administration go to great pains to make it clear that there would be no repeat of what happened to the Japanese Americans in WWII?
Because the country is too liberal. Bush isn't emperor.
AHHH another question goes unanswered.
Ask any question. I'm not afraid of questions like you are.
Why (like I asked you last time) did the gov't apoligize and pay money if what was done was right for the country. We should have nothing to be sorry for, shouldn't we?
They shouldn't have apologized but the innocent internees should have been helped back into business if they lost businesses, etc. But that doesn't make internment wrong.
You been playing this game for a while now trying to make it seem like I can't make up my mind, but like with everything else you have shown no proof.
You can't.