[#3Fan]

You're nuts. There is NO relationship between muslim-americans and the people who perpetrated the 9-11-01 attacks. The attacks were not perpetrated by Americans on Americans.

You're wrong. Those acts were commited by Islamic people living for years in America as regular American citizens live, with jobs, family, the SUV's, everything. Now if you want to naively believe these terrorists had no contact with any of the millions of Islamic-Americans that's your stupidity showing. No doubt there were many Japanese-Americans sympathetic to the Japanese cause that led to the attack on Pearl Harbor. In times of invasion or rebellion, this nation has to do what it can to ensure it's survival.

Again, you digress from the main issue, which is the incarceration of innocent Americans on the sole basis of race is clearly uncontitutional. WHY DO YOU KEEP DEFENDING FDR'S SOCIALIST POLICIES?

The constitution clearly differentiates times of invasion and rebellion from normal times. Why do you refuse to ensure the survival of our republic?

[bonesmccoy]

1. There has never been any documented or demonstrated cases of sabotage or insurrection either in Hawaii or the West Coast of the United States. Attempts to use disloyalty as a reason for unlawful incarceration are simply fraudulent.

2. Your attempt to qualify constitutional law as being inapplicable during a time of "invasion or rebellion" is patently incorrect. After all, we have had many times of rebellion (each time a Presidential incumbent is defeated upon reelection). Please point out the section of the US Constitution which suggests suspension of the US Constitution is appropriate.

It doesn't exist. Kobayashi v. United States exists. Does your phantom clause in the US Constitution?