Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paleo Conservative
Wouldn't that sort of defeat the whole point of allowing states to seceed? One thing to slap them with tariffs, but quite another thing to blockade them. And wouldn't that sort of thing eventually lead to a war, anyway? I doubt the CSA would've just taken that lying down.
148 posted on 03/08/2003 11:05:15 PM PST by Green Knight ("Nowhere to run to, baby, nowhere to hide..." [Osama's Theme Song])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: Green Knight
And wouldn't that sort of thing eventually lead to a war, anyway? I doubt the CSA would've just taken that lying down.

The CSA did not have a lot of people emloyed in maritime trades and lacked the nautical experience that New Englanders had. Winfield Scott wanted to primarily choke off the South's commerce through blockades and seizing control of the Mississippi River. If his stategy had been employed the Civil War might have been much less bloody.

149 posted on 03/08/2003 11:15:30 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (This space left intentionally blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson