Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
Yes, when the evidence supports it, not supposition and most of what I see is supposition.

I see you arguing inconsequential details, not major suppositions.

When you allow God the use of natural processes you've already fudged on the literal occasion for a redeemer and it doesn't matter anymore how life started or how it evolved.

897 posted on 02/26/2002 5:39:43 PM PST by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 893 | View Replies ]


To: Nebullis
not major suppositions.

Since when is a major supposition not a supposition.

899 posted on 02/26/2002 5:42:15 PM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 897 | View Replies ]

To: Nebullis
When you allow God the use of natural processes you've already fudged on the literal occasion for a redeemer and it doesn't matter anymore how life started or how it evolved.

So you're saying I must claim God supernaturally interferes in every birth in order for each person to have a soul. Nonsense.

900 posted on 02/26/2002 5:45:19 PM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 897 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson