There is no speciation between dogs and wolves. They can mate and produce mixed offspring. Therefore, as I have been saying, in spite of the tremendous physical differences between dogs themselves and wolves there has been no genetic change in the species. They are proof of the tremendous variety of genes that can be found in a species (man is another example).
What do you think of horses and donkeys? They can mate, but the offspring can't reproduce. Isn't this exactly what recently-speciated forms should be like?
I didn't know the appendix was actually needed, but my point is still valid: vestigial organs are evidence of descent from something where they weren't vestigial. What about the occasional person who is born with a tail? where did the tail genes come from? Obviously, his parents. Where did they get them from?
Your statement is an example of the know-nothingism of the evolutionists:
That's just plain rude.