[VadeRetro]

None that I can see. In fact, I have explicitly avoided many of the mistakes mentioned there.

Have you avoided them all or haven't you?

Hows about: ‘Natural selection as tautology’ ; ‘Evolution is just a theory.’ ; ‘Creationists believe in microevolution but not macroevolution.’

I got a tingle on ‘Archaeopteryx is a fraud’ too but won't swear up front that it was you on that one.

[scripter]

You asked gore3000 if he had avoided some mistakes listed at a creationist site (AIG). And you listed the following mistakes:

Hows about: ‘Natural selection as tautology’ ; ‘Evolution is just a theory.’ ; ‘Creationists believe in microevolution but not macroevolution.’

I couldn't not find the above at the AIG site you had prviously provided a link to, and was wondering if you could provide a specific URL to the above.

I've never heard the first mistake you mention, but I have heard creationists use the second mistake, and the third, creationists believe in micro but not macroevolution, I thought was true but here you're saying AIG is calling it a mistake...

As a fence sitter, I would greatly appreciate it.

[gore3000]

"Hows about: ‘Natural selection as tautology’ ; ‘Evolution is just a theory.’ ; ‘Creationists believe in microevolution but not macroevolution.’

I have not said any of the above. I have said that many of things you evolutionists do say are tautologies. A good example of which is your ridiculous statement about mammary glands and ears which are a tautology and prove nothing. Only facts are evidence, suppositions are not facts.