You are so determined to remain in the dark. Pasteur did not test what you creationists call "abiogenesis." He tested his theory that bacteria were responsible for what, back then, ignorant people called "spontaneous generation." Didn't you read the article? (No, of course you didn't.) People used to believe that rats spontaneously appeared in old underwear! Although the creationist websites use Pasteur as one of their favorite talking points, his work had nothing -- absolutely nothing -- to do with your boogyman of abiogenesis. For once in your strange career in these threads, try to learn something. It won't hurt you.
As usual, when shown to be wrong, you resort to semantics. Pasteur proved that life omly comes from other life. That is the only scientific proof relating to the matter of abiogenesis.
You said in#517:
"If you see a planet full of life, such as the Earth, you can -- quite reasonably, based on our knowledge from chemistry and biology -- suggest that it developed over a long time from a pre-biotic soup."
By your own terms therefore, abiogenesis is nonsense.