[PatrickHenry]

If you didn't do either of those things--and you didn't--you've certainly provided a nice object lesson on the accuracy and limited focus of the AndrewC Accuracy Police Detail.

AndrewC has the natural abilities that would make him an excellent proof-reader. But fly-specking, although a necessary task, isn't the same thing as making a substantive review, and it certainly doesn't constitute a rebuttal.

[VadeRetro]

Especially when your conscientiousness has such a limited scope.

[AndrewC]

and it certainly doesn't constitute a rebuttal

Neither does ad hominem, but that never stops you from trying, which is counter to the please line above each post reply window.