[gore3000]

You have also failed to defend your reliance upon the "even evolutionists have shown that man did not come from monkeys"

As usual when your back is against the wall you start denying what even evolutionists have been admitting to for decades (and what you have accepted as a true statement throughtout this thread) - that man did not descend from any of the monkey species - chimps, orangs or whatever. For decades they have been stating that man and monkey "branched out" more than 5 million years ago.

[VadeRetro]

As usual when your back is against the wall you start denying what even evolutionists have been admitting to for decades (and what you have accepted as a true statement throughtout this thread) - that man did not descend from any of the monkey species - chimps, orangs or whatever. For decades they have been stating that man and monkey "branched out" more than 5 million years ago.

And all the evidence I've ever cited to you is in support of what they do say and not what they don't. So what is all that spewing about what they don't say?

[VadeRetro]

Again, you seem to have "forgotten" one of the questions.

ARE YOU GOING TO CITE A SOURCE FOR YOUR CLAIM THAT DNA EVIDENCE DISPROVES THE HIPPO RELATIONSHIP TO WHALES OR ADMIT TO MAKING AN ERROR?

BTW - this discussion is of course purely for amusement since DNA evidence has already shown that whales are not related to hippos as evolutionists have claimed using "evidence" similar to the one presented by you and other evolutionists in this discussion.

-- gore3000

Nothing shows your cowardice and dishonesty more than the way you run away from this one. Nothing makes the lurkers wonder "What's wrong with that boy?" more than the way you cannot face admitting any sort of mistake when debating an Evo.

The thing is, it's really too late. You've let it go for 500 posts, a dozen or more unanswered challenges. There's no pretending anymore.