Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000
If homo sapiens first met erectus after homo sapiens was already around as your phony "proof" states then Erectus could not have been the ancestor of homo sapiens.

"First met?" Is that the gimmick?

You are making a painful point of being stupid here. You've been on these threads for some months, perhaps a year. Models of speciation have been explained to you. Punk Eek has been explained to you. Turn off the machine and go think about what you're doing.

Nobody's going to change the school currriculum based upon the mixture of illogic and dishonesty you're using above.

1,370 posted on 03/03/2002 9:34:54 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1369 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
"First met?" Is that the gimmick?

Yes "first met". Read Junior's moronic proof on post#1098. We have been discussing this for many posts and now you are going to tell us you do not understand it? You are being completely dishonest - as usual.

1,378 posted on 03/03/2002 7:18:47 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1370 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson