We know what evolution is. The disagreement is over how to best to write a version for dummies. You were given the kindergarten version earlier and have yet to mount a substantive response against that one.
It's been done. The adult version can be expressed in a paragraph or two, i.e. a reasonable person might could at least listen to a theory which required one or two probabilistic miracles in the whole history of the Earth, but evolution requires an endless sequence of probabilistic miracles, and no reasonable person should want to hear about that.
The version for kindergardeners and feebs is here
Yes, then tell us exactly what the theory of evolution is. You and Vade keep disagreeing with each other. If it were a scientific theory there would be no disagreements as to what the theory is.
The reason I will not respond to it yet is quite simple. Once I refute your theory, you folk will say that you forgot something, that you did not mean something or that the theory had changed in the last 6 seconds. I will not play that game. Agree to a definition and we will discuss it.