Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000
Problem is that they are totally irrelevant to the discussion. They are all too old to be ancestors of homo sapiens.

Don't be silly. You said there was no trace of archaic Homo sapiens (AKA Homo sapiens heidelbergensis). I posted the skulls. I also posted the chart which shows no gaps of overlap in hominid species after 4 million years ago.

Gaps don't help your case even where they do exist. Was your great great great grandfather too old to be your ancestor? Just because you don't know who your father is doesn't mean you didn't have any ancestors.

1,285 posted on 03/02/2002 4:36:40 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1271 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
You said there was no trace of archaic Homo sapiens

Archaic is a generic word which can be used for anything so your statement is just your usual attempt at confusionism.

You posted skulls that were irrelevant to the discussion, they have all been long extinct. None of them could have been ancestors of homo sapiens because they were long extinct by the time that homo sapiens appeared. As I have said, the dead do not reproduce. Let's see you refute that.

1,302 posted on 03/02/2002 6:32:35 AM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1285 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson