[gore3000]

"While this is not "proof" as G3K would like,"

On the post one or two before this one, I give you 3 definite citations that homo erectus has not been around for some 400,000 years. Note also that none of the citations are from "creationist" sites. You give me a "maybe" citation. The least you can do is apologize for your insults. I know I will not see that however.

The problem with accepting your source though is that these Java fossils had been "definitely" dated much earlier than 50,000 years ago. Now, when the evos need an ancestor for man, the dates of the fossils are suddenly "revised" to create an ancestor for man. Forgive me if I am very suspicious of the new dating.

[Junior]

And I showed you where some very recent data shows a remnant population may have survived until 50,000 years ago (one authority says 27,000 years ago). The dates you cite come from sources which predate the sources I supplied and are therefore not as up to date as the articles I gave.