Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
There is no need to do that. You have appropriately posted the information and should be commended for your forthrightness.

Most kind of you, Sir! I think you once asked if the cetacean-looking head of Mesonychus that caused all the controversy had to be explained by convergent evolution. From the figures in that Scientific American article, I don't get the impression that such an interpretation is necessary. After all, there's a better chance of you looking like your great uncle than like someone selected at random in the population.

The "For-Dummies" naming on this figure is unfortunate. (What ever happened to the old Sci-Am?) "Arlene" is non-hippo artiodactyls. "Megan" represents the mesonychids. "Celia" is the cetaceans and "Heidi" is hippos. There's a still-viable competing version--uncoupling "Heidi" from "Celia" and hooking her up to "Arlene"--but it doesn't change the position of "Megan."

Am I saying that camels descended from savage carnivores? Maybe. I hear they're still rather evil-tempered.

1,175 posted on 03/01/2002 5:07:34 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1168 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
Am I saying that camels descended from savage carnivores? Maybe. I hear they're still rather evil-tempered.

Kinda like QM, hard to believe. The figure could be used to conclude that Megan and Heidi were contemporaneous

1,179 posted on 03/01/2002 6:32:22 AM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson