1 posted on
02/16/2002 4:38:09 PM PST by
cornelis
To: Aquinasfan, Dumb_Ox, beckett
bump
2 posted on
02/16/2002 4:43:45 PM PST by
cornelis
To: cornelis
I was a student of Prof. Ellis Sandoz at LSU. Dr. Sandoz was a student and devotee of Voegelin. I think EV taught at LSU.
Anyway, I hadn't heard or thought of that name for quite some time. I just pulled out The New Science of Politics and might give it a read. Boy do I remember the spudaioi, dike, doxa, epistime.
That sure brings back memories. I think I learned more Greek in that class than I would have in a Greek language class.
9 posted on
02/16/2002 5:11:49 PM PST by
jayef
To: cornelis
I understand Aristotle's notion of political justice to refer to "Best Constitution theory."
I do not think Aristotle has a concept of Natural Law, one would be hard pressed to find support for that in EN V.7.
10 posted on
02/16/2002 5:17:01 PM PST by
diotima
To: cornelis
Hummmmmmmm..... Could you run that by me again? I have this itchy rash & I was a little distracted. ;9}
12 posted on
02/16/2002 5:25:45 PM PST by
Ditter
To: cornelis
Given the dominance of the politikon, there can be no natural law conceived as an eternal, immutable, universal valid normativity confronting the changeable positive law. This is so because the justice of the polis, its nomos, insofar it constitutes the rule of law among men free and equal, is itself right by nature. The justice of the polis is not positive law in the modern sense but rather essential law within which alone there arises the tension between physei dikaion and a possible derailment into the making of laws by arbitrary human will. Of course, the law of the polis is also legislated and obligatory in this capacity, but this attribute takes second rank behind the question whether the content of the statue is physei or rather the product of human hybris. This Aristotelian conception of nomos does not seem to differ in principle from the older one of Heraclitus or SophoclesThese statements seem contradictory to me...what am I missing?
16 posted on
02/16/2002 5:57:37 PM PST by
Pistias
To: cornelis
bookmarked for later. I'll print it out, so I can give it my full attention.
To: cornelis
Let us not forget Aristotles comparison with the market situation, to which one or another measure might be adequateI don't know the reference...do you know where it is?
20 posted on
02/16/2002 6:15:49 PM PST by
Pistias
To: cornelis
The theory is that any student who puts up with this crap to get his sheepskin, will be a good corporate drone.
To: cornelis
![](http://www.olavodecarvalho.org/images/image017.jpg)
"Please, don't immanentize the eschaton."
(very cool, sophisticated intellectual). Every conservative should read The New Science of Politics.
Eric Voegelin site
To: cornelis
To: cornelis
To: cornelis
Appears that your argument is rather "new age" ie: Arostitle (384-322bc) Taoist texts have discussed this subject from about 5.000bc
To: cornelis
Would you post the full citation information for this work or a link to it, please?
65 posted on
02/21/2002 11:18:53 AM PST by
Pistias
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson