Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kwyjibo
"True, but the girl was not harmed BECAUSE the "parents" were swingers."

You don't know that. I would argue exactly the opposite. Because they were "swingers" (whoring around might be a better word for it), they are exposing themselves and their children to huge risks. They get drunk/stoned and pick up barflies, then bring them home with them. Aside from sexually transmitted diseases, they should worry about perverts, serial killers, home robbery (excellent casing opportunity, after all) and any number of vile things. Despite claims to the contrary, child molesters often use a parent, usually the mother, as the quickest route to the child.

461 posted on 02/12/2002 4:54:00 AM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]


To: golitely
Calling "swinging" just an alternate lifestyle choice that is OK because everybody consents to it is like dressing up a "titty bar" (my dad's terminology) with a nice restaurant and valet parking and calling it a "Gentlemen's Club". A rose by any other name is still a strip joint, and married couples who have an "open marriage" with other couples, for whatever reason, are still screwing around, no matter what you call it.
469 posted on 02/12/2002 5:11:17 AM PST by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson