[OKCSubmariner]

Why not tell your compalint in your reply #40 instead to the guy who wrote reply #27 and tried to spin the Enron mess to debunk the article on this thread and to help out Bush.

You are still not presenting any substantive articles yet spqrzilla9, just more spin to fool people into not examining valid questions about the need for constructive improvements, for constructive corrections of the mistakes and policies of Bush, the FBI, the DOJ and the CIA.

You could learn how to do this better if you would follow Danes fine example who posted an excellent article in reply #42.

[spqrzilla9]

When you post an actual "mistake", or other factual comment on the actions of the CIA, President Bush or anyone else, then one could construct a rebuttal. This article contains none of those.

Just Bush-bashing of the kind Robinson states he doesn't want to see here.

[concerned about politics]

for constructive corrections of the mistakes and policies of Bush, the FBI, the DOJ and the CIA.

You're circle jerking. You're also worthy of ignoring.

Want proof? If you really cared, you'd seek it out yourself instead of using others for your own self-agrandizement.

You're Bush bashing. Do you hate the color of his eyes too? Do they link him to another scandle?

Get a life.