Nothing in this piece even begins to support the innuendoes. There are no "facts" that need investigation. One can only conclude that this is just baseless Bush-bashing.
Yeh. Bears repeating. The Libertarians are still unhappy their guy didn't win. Neither did Gore.
There is much more substance to the article than to the spin of your reply #32.
Why not try posting some artricle that contain facts to support your point of view rather than just claiming that the article is baseless? At least Tiple produced a valid article from a good news source which is a lot more than what you have done so far.
If you really are interested in searching for the facts I suggest you go to the Boston Globe website and the Washington Post website and you can find many more valid articles on the same subject that provide a sound basis for raising valid, critical questions. If you search the FR archives you will also find other posts from other reputable news sources that raise the same valid facts and questions.
Your spin reminds me of the spin in reply #27 and also by the White House that Enron is just a business problem and not a political problem. That is an absurd spin even if the White House is filled with saints because Enron gave huge sums to POLITICIANS , Democrats and Republicans alike, who knew there was a problem and did not take corrective actions even when warned by US gov officials repeatedly in hearings (this was revealed by guests on NightLine who had testified earlier before Congress).
Enron is perceived by the public as a political problem regardless of White House spins to the contrary. The White House is taking the wrong approach and looks foolish (who do they think they are kidding, hmm?) to try and bludgeon with PR blitz anyone who suggests it is also political.